Retronix has taken delivery of a TPO412A Thermostream
Temperature Forcing System in response to the increasing demand from customers
to temperatures test ICs and other components. Capable of temperature extremes
beyond -55°C to +125°C this nitrogen fed
temperature forcing system allows Retronix to test ICs at commercial,
industrial and military temperature ranges. Customers are asking Retronix to
confirm certain product data sheet parameters at temperature and there is an
increasing demand from OEM customers to characterise commercial grade ICs at
wider temperature extremes. Retronix also plans to develop its extensive Curve
Trace Test capability to include test at temperature.
Thursday, 14 February 2013
Tuesday, 5 February 2013
Retronix's Process Reduces OEM Production Costs for NPI by Over 50%
A division of a
large telecoms company was responsible for the design of new products,
specifically telecoms switches. These pcbs cost $15k each to make. This company
would make perhaps 5 different versions, each one an improved version of the
first, until they were satisfied with the design and released it to production.
Although each
new version of the pcb is slightly different, most of the ICs, which make up
90% of the cost, are the same.
By sending the
previous version of the pcb to Retronix for component recovery, the oem reduced
the cost of their NPI production process by over 50%, without compromising
quality, using Retronix’s IC rescue process.
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
Retronix Takes Delivery of its New High Capacity Laser Balling System
Retronix has taken delivery of its custom developed high
capacity laser balling and reballing system. Developed in partnership with
Retronix by a world renowned laser company, the new laser system will be
capable of reballing multiple ICs over a wide work area. Retronix is finalising
the development of the new laser system and will partner with existing
customers to finalise its trialling and commissioning. The new laser represents
a significant investment by Retronix and will reinforce its leadership in the
market for balling and reballing ICs.
Retronix Successfully Trials Plastic Core Solder Balls
Plastic Core Solder Balls (PCSB) provide a method of ensuring stand-off height between an IC package and the substrate or PCB. Inside the SnAg sphere is a polymer core buffered by nickel and copper layers. Standard Pb free reflow profiles can be used to attach the PCSBs unlike the alternative method of High Melting Point (HMP) spheres.
For RF and microwave applications, PCSBs can provide a predictable and well controlled path length and inductance solution for package attachment to PCBs.
Thursday, 20 December 2012
RoHS compliance: Case where the ICs did not have the correct alloy
A UK distributor had old stock of an IC that a customer
wanted. However the stock was in leaded format, and the customer needed it RoHS (lead
free).
The customer was suspicious of the distributor’s ability to do
this but having limited options decided to proceed but he needed guarantees. Retronix fixed this issue as a guarantor by going through the process with the customer.
- Chemical strip back of leaded device legs
- Auto replating of RoHS compliant solder coating
- XRF Test to ensure compliance
We then made an agreement deal whereby distributor/Retronix supplied
the parts in batches, with the customer only paying when devices were
successfully placed, eliminating the risk.
Retronix
has invested in the latest automated retinning technology
to ensure the highest levels of process repeatability and
quality for alloy conversion or alloy refreshing.
For more info -
Know more about Retronix | CLICK HERE |
We welcome you to join our LinkedIn group | CLICK HERE |
Contact us : | CLICK HERE | info@retronix.com | sales@retronix.com
YouTube | LinkedIn | Twitter
Know more about Retronix | CLICK HERE |
We welcome you to join our LinkedIn group | CLICK HERE |
Contact us : | CLICK HERE | info@retronix.com | sales@retronix.com
YouTube | LinkedIn | Twitter
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
RoHS Conversion in the Defence sector
Many defence systems rely on electronic parts that are no longer produced by the original manufacturer. That reliance is based, in part, on the long life cycles of these systems.
A UK defence company was buying BGAs via a
distributor. Their requirement was a SnPb finish (leaded) and the BGAs that were purchased were Pb free.
Removing the lead free balls and replacing them with SnPb was an
accepted process, but one which affected reliability via multiple reflows.
Between us we managed to secure their allocation before the
BGAs had balls placed on them, and they were subsequently finished on the
Retronix BGA reballing laser machine. By adopting the Retronix laser process we improved the reliability compared to the old process.
For more info :
Know more about Retronix | CLICK HERE |
We welcome you to join our LinkedIn group | CLICK HERE |
Contact us : | CLICK HERE | info@retronix.com | sales@retronix.com
YouTube | LinkedIn | Twitter
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
Retronix Ltd. | Counterfeit Alert 2012 |
A customer sent approx. 5000 parts [BUK139-50DL] to check the authenticity of the components. The customer who had procured these parts believed that the devices were originals and worked perfectly fine. He sent these parts to Retronix for Visual inspection, marking permanency testing, de-cap and a basic electrical test.
First a visual check of the label information was done and it showed on the labels attached on each reel, that the parts were lead free. Moving onto deeper visual checks on the components for the markings and the condition of the terminal told a different story. Retronix used the standard IDEA-STD-1010-B to compare the results.
Images 1 & 2 show faint indent markings and corner damage, these signs are evidence of remarking the components. Moreover there was no country of origin on the devices.
Image 3 shows further evidence that parts are remarked/sanded down as the device is uneven.

Parts on the same reel showing different DRAIN tab features, also the top part of the device was in a very poor condition
Further to this, parts from the same reel showed different DRAIN tabs, the condition of the tab was poor, deep scratches and signs of damages to the edge as shown.
The Retronix testing team then went on to perform an X-ray test of these devices for a more in depth look and as per ERAI-STD-1010-B used for as reference found the following:

The test revealed that different results of die and the drain tab, all the parts on the same reel with the same datecodes should match under the X-Ray. As was mentioned earlier the labels showed all the devices to be lead free, and in order to authenticate this the X-ray test was performed which revealed otherwise.
The de-capsulation test was then done on the devices :
Figure : Images illustrate the topside (1) and the underside (2) of the sample device. Analysis suggests no evidence of attempted re-marking or re-packaging.
The images illustrate the package markings (1) , the entire die surface (2), and the die viewed at high magnification (3) and (4) , with no known good component or information from the datasheet, the die could not be confirmed as genuine. If the information on the datasheet is to be compared to the die, then Retronix believed that there would be more internal circuitry. Moreover no Die markings were found showing part number or the manufacturer.
Further checks revealed that the parts were already reported to the ERAI, where complaints such as parts smoking exploding on the boards were being reported.
Conclusion :
With all the evidence found Retronix believed the parts to be counterfeit components and not suitable for use on PCBs due to the electrical tests that were carried out and also with the information found on the ERAI website.
For more info -
Know more about Retronix | CLICK HERE |
Know more about our IC Testing services | CLICK HERE |
We welcome you to join our LinkedIn group | CLICK HERE |
Contact us : | CLICK HERE | info@retronix.com | sales@retronix.com
YouTube | LinkedIn | Twitter
First a visual check of the label information was done and it showed on the labels attached on each reel, that the parts were lead free. Moving onto deeper visual checks on the components for the markings and the condition of the terminal told a different story. Retronix used the standard IDEA-STD-1010-B to compare the results.
Images 1 & 2 show faint indent markings and corner damage, these signs are evidence of remarking the components. Moreover there was no country of origin on the devices.
Image 3 shows further evidence that parts are remarked/sanded down as the device is uneven.
Parts on the same reel showing different DRAIN tab features, also the top part of the device was in a very poor condition
Further to this, parts from the same reel showed different DRAIN tabs, the condition of the tab was poor, deep scratches and signs of damages to the edge as shown.
The Retronix testing team then went on to perform an X-ray test of these devices for a more in depth look and as per ERAI-STD-1010-B used for as reference found the following:
The test revealed that different results of die and the drain tab, all the parts on the same reel with the same datecodes should match under the X-Ray. As was mentioned earlier the labels showed all the devices to be lead free, and in order to authenticate this the X-ray test was performed which revealed otherwise.
The de-capsulation test was then done on the devices :
Figure : Images illustrate the topside (1) and the underside (2) of the sample device. Analysis suggests no evidence of attempted re-marking or re-packaging.
The images illustrate the package markings (1) , the entire die surface (2), and the die viewed at high magnification (3) and (4) , with no known good component or information from the datasheet, the die could not be confirmed as genuine. If the information on the datasheet is to be compared to the die, then Retronix believed that there would be more internal circuitry. Moreover no Die markings were found showing part number or the manufacturer.
Further checks revealed that the parts were already reported to the ERAI, where complaints such as parts smoking exploding on the boards were being reported.
Conclusion :
With all the evidence found Retronix believed the parts to be counterfeit components and not suitable for use on PCBs due to the electrical tests that were carried out and also with the information found on the ERAI website.
For more info -
Know more about Retronix | CLICK HERE |
Know more about our IC Testing services | CLICK HERE |
We welcome you to join our LinkedIn group | CLICK HERE |
Contact us : | CLICK HERE | info@retronix.com | sales@retronix.com
YouTube | LinkedIn | Twitter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



